couple walking in rain under umbr

Whose Rights Are You Defending?


Proverbs 31:8-9; Isaiah 1:17; Matthew 5:38-42; Matthew 20:1-16; Luke 17:7-10; Acts 16:35-40; Acts 22:25-29; Acts 25:11; Romans 3:23-24; Romans 13:1-4; 1 Corinthians 6:1-8; 1 Corinthians 9:12, 15; Philippians 2:5-8


“I know my rights.”

You hear it at school board meetings and city councils, in comment sections, in the grocery store line. Election seasons make it especially loud. Sometimes the language names a real injustice. Sometimes it turns politics into fear that somebody is coming to take what’s ours. Christians need enough discernment to tell the difference.

Christianity does something strange to the word rights. It keeps asking a question our politics doesn’t ask nearly often enough: what if the right is genuinely mine, and love still asks me not to insist on it?

That isn’t the same as saying rights don’t matter. It means they aren’t the highest thing. Love is.

Christians Really Do Have Rights

Let’s start there, because some versions of this conversation skip it. Human beings carry a dignity that doesn’t come from a constitution. We’re made in God’s image (Gen. 1:27), which is why James can say it’s wrong to curse people, “who are made in the likeness of God” (James 3:9). That dignity doesn’t evaporate when someone sins, or when a government fails to notice it.

So Scripture can speak of the rights of the poor and needy as something worth defending. “Open your mouth for the mute, for the rights of all who are destitute. Open your mouth, judge righteously, defend the rights of the poor and needy” (Prov. 31:8-9). And the prophets keep pressing: “seek justice, correct oppression; bring justice to the fatherless, plead the widow’s cause” (Isa. 1:17).

Paul didn’t hesitate to use the protections he had. When he and Silas were beaten publicly in Philippi without a trial, he waited until officials sent word to release them, then said, in effect, that they were Roman citizens and the magistrates could come and escort them out themselves (Acts 16:35-40). Later he asked whether it was lawful to flog a Roman citizen who hadn’t been condemned (Acts 22:25-29), and he finally appealed to Caesar (Acts 25:11). Using the protections you have isn’t unspiritual.

But Not a Debt God Owes Us

There is one place where the language of rights fails completely, and that’s in front of God.

None of us can point to our record and say, “You owe me salvation.” Paul says all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God (Rom. 3:23), and the wages of sin is death (Rom. 6:23). Wages are what you’ve earned. Jesus tells of a servant who comes in from the field and is told to prepare the master’s supper: “We are unworthy servants; we have only done what was our duty” (Luke 17:7-10). We can’t present God with an invoice for forgiveness, adoption, resurrection, or a place at his table.

The workers in the vineyard make the same point from the other side. The landowner pays the first group exactly what was agreed, then is more generous to those who came late, and asks, “Am I not allowed to do what I choose with what belongs to me?” (Matt. 20:15). Grace refuses to be governed by our calculations of merit.

This doesn’t make God arbitrary. He has made promises. We are “justified by his grace as a gift” (Rom. 3:24), and faith doesn’t stand before him saying, “I deserve this.” It says, “You promised this.” We cling to forgiveness because God has freely bound himself to his word in Christ.

Before God, we have no claim of merit. We have a promise.

Rights Governments Recognize and Protect

Between people, rights are real. Governments write particular legal protections, and those can change. But a government isn’t the source of human worth, and it isn’t the final measure of justice. A law can fail to protect something that ought to be protected. It can even become a tool of injustice.

That’s why Paul’s description of governing authority matters. The ruler is “God’s servant for your good” (Rom. 13:4). That’s a vocation, and it’s also a standard. It means Christians can be grateful for the protections their country gives, and still ask whether those protections are doing what they’re for.

And since no earthly arrangement lasts forever, we can hold even good laws with some humility. They’re gifts, not guarantees.

What Jesus Did With What Was His

The New Testament’s answer to “what do I do with my rights?” begins with Christ. Jesus, “though he was in the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped, but made himself nothing, taking the form of a servant” (Phil. 2:5-8).

He didn’t stop being who he was. He didn’t pretend he had no dignity. He refused to use what was his as leverage for himself, and spent it for others.

Christian freedom looks like that: not pretending you have no rights, but refusing to make self-protection the organizing principle of your life.

Sometimes Love Uses a Right, Sometimes It Lays One Down

Paul did both. He used his citizenship in Philippi and Jerusalem. And he told the Corinthians that he had rights he never claimed: to be financially supported by the churches he served, for example. “We have not made use of this right,” he writes, “but we endure anything rather than put an obstacle in the way of the gospel of Christ” (1 Cor. 9:12). A few verses later: “I have made no use of any of these rights” (1 Cor. 9:15).

Notice what he doesn’t say. He doesn’t say he discovered he never had rights. He says, I have this right, and I’m choosing not to insist on it. You can’t give up what you never owned.

Jesus teaches the same posture. Turn the other cheek. Give your cloak as well as your coat. Go the second mile (Matt. 5:38-42). Paul asks believers who were suing each other, “Why not rather suffer wrong? Why not rather be defrauded?” (1 Cor. 6:7). These aren’t rules for running a legal system, and they aren’t a ban on seeking justice. They describe how people who’ve been forgiven everything hold their own claims. Loosely.

Yourself and Your Neighbor

Here Luther helps. I’m paraphrasing, so treat the wording as mine. In his 1523 essay on temporal authority, he draws a line as practical as it is simple. In what touches you and your own cause, you live by the gospel and bear the injustice. In what touches your neighbor, love won’t let you stand by. A Christian will put up with a great deal being done to him. He won’t put up with it being done to the person next to him, because his neighbor didn’t volunteer to be the one who suffers.

The verbs in Proverbs and Isaiah are all pointed at someone else, too. Open your mouth. Defend. Plead. They aren’t reflexive.

Hold your own rights loosely. Defend your neighbor’s rights as seriously as your own.

It means the question a Christian brings to public life isn’t only What’s mine, and who’s threatening it? It’s Who’s being wronged, and who’s standing up for them? Pay particular attention to the neighbor your own side finds easy to ignore, the one whose rights are being argued over in the abstract, the one other Christians are tempted to see as a problem instead of a person.

Self-Denial Can’t Be Imposed

This idea can be twisted. It has been used to make suffering people feel guilty.

“Suffer the wrong” is something you can say about yourself. It’s never something you get to say to someone else about their wrong. Voluntary self-denial cannot be imposed on another person to make their exploitation easier. A pastor, a boss, a spouse, or a church that tells a hurting person to give up their rights and stay quiet is doing something Scripture never does.

Nothing here says an abused person should endure it, that a victim of a crime should look the other way, or that someone being exploited should keep taking it. Protecting yourself from harm, calling the police, going to court, seeking safety, and reporting abuse are not failures of Christian humility. Any of them may be exactly how you love the person standing next to you, since the next person an abuser hurts will be someone’s neighbor too.

The difference is posture, not passivity. A person can fight hard for justice without needing to win, without hating anyone, and without making their own comfort the thing they can’t live without.

Politics After Grace

None of this settles political disagreement. Defending your neighbor’s rights sounds straightforward until neighbors have competing claims. One person points to religious liberty, another to nondiscrimination. One cites property rights, another a public need. We still have to argue honestly about what rights people possess, where one person’s liberty meets another person’s protection, and what justice requires when genuine goods collide. Grace doesn’t eliminate that work. It changes the posture we bring to it.

Christians should also use the word persecution carefully. Losing cultural influence, political preference, or majority status is not automatically persecution. At the same time, genuine violations of religious freedom are real even when Christians elsewhere suffer far worse. The task is to name what’s actually happening without exaggerating it or minimizing it.

So when the next campaign promises to protect what’s yours, listen with different questions. Not only Does this protect me? but Who does it protect? Who does it leave out? Who has no one speaking for them?

Rights are real. They just aren’t our god. We were given a place at the table we didn’t earn and couldn’t have bought, and that tends to loosen the grip. Use what you’ve been given. Vote, speak, defend. Keep your hand open for yourself and your arm out for the person who needs it.

Get notified of new posts by email

Thoughtful writing on grace, faith, church, and hymnody. Sent occasionally.

I won't spam your inbox. Read the privacy policy for more info.

You Might Like These, Too

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.